The Most Insidious Trap in New Media Targeting

Aug 9, 2013

The Most Insidious Trap in New Media Targeting

Is it –

  • Fuzzy strategy?
  • Unclear target segment?
  • Bottom fishing for cheap inventory?

While they are all valid issues, the sin that is most insidious and common is aiming for relevance but buying reach instead. Various media research and targeting tools available in the market today make it easy to get reach with some relevance based on demographics or other criteria. This is especially true on mass media such as TV where the measurement currencies use demographics as the main means of selecting audience. In the evolving world of fragmented consumers, this buys you reach but not relevance.

On the digital side, many targeting tools are available such as cookies and keywords that make it possible to select audience based on relevance. However, most such tools are provided by the media companies themselves or by third parties using data supplied by the media company. Their recommendations tend to optimize for reach first, since it serves the need of the media company to sell more reach and the buyer’s willingness to buy that reach provided there is some relevanceThe net result is audience optimized for reach first and then relevance.

Programmatic buying methods tend to optimize for cost more than relevance. This is helpful in selecting from a sea of commodity inventory but we are still looking for the relevance needle in the cheap inventory haystack.

So how do we buy relevance and reach on reasonable costs? It turns out that starting with relevance first and then adding reasonably priced reach is a far more effective mechanism than the other way around. This means we are first looking for clusters of inventory that are highly relevant to us and are priced reasonably. Pooling many such clusters together then gives us the reach we need.

This can work regardless of your media or targeting method. For most social and video, you can buy relevance clusters using keywords. For display, you can buy the cookie pools that are mapped for relevance to your target segment. For traditional media such as TV, Radio or Print, you can buy the most relevant choices by mapping the keywords to respective media properties.

Leave a Comment





Related Posts

Case Study:
TV & Entertainment

Driving A W K W A F I N A to #1 Using TrueAffinity Data Graph, Comedy Central was able to construct a comprehensive media plan based on the behavioral data of close fans and viewers. By reviewing and discovering...

Case Study:
Neutronian

Performance Case Study Problem Statement In the evolving landscape where third-party cookie based campaign targeting wanes, cookieless targeting options are being sought out by brands and agencies but not all solutions are equal when it comes to their effectiveness. The...

Case Study:
QSR

Finding and Driving New Users for Dunkin' With the holiday season in full swing, a top gaming console wanted to do everything it could to steal market share from it's main competitor-Playstation. Affinity Answers created a segment to target people...